Brent – WTI disconnect

If you are a commodities person at all, you will know that there are two major types of crude traded on exchanges. One is Brent Crude which is the type of crude oil that is produced by the Norwegians and the British in the North Sea. The other is West Texas Intermediate (WTI), which is the oil grade produced in West Texas. Crude oil for delivery is quoted in reference to these two grades of oil.

Recently, an enormous 33% premium has developed for Brent. To me, this gap is utterly inexplicable except by technical factors. Translation: some players have a huge long position of WTI and they are getting squeezed.

In Wikipedia’s definition of WTI, they note – as I have – that WTI should trade at a premium to Brent because it is a lighter grade that is easier to refine. They add this note:

Although WTI is expected to command a higher price than Brent crude, on May 24 2007, it was priced at $63.58 per barrel as against $71.39 per barrel for Brent (Bloomberg). The change in price differential may have been due to a temporary shortage of refining capacity; on April 13, WTI Crude at Cushing may have temporarily lost its status as a gauge of world oil prices. A large stockpile of oil at the Cushing, Oklahoma storage and pricing facility (mainly due to a refinery shutdown caused prices to be artificially depressed at the Cushing pricing point. As stockpiles reduced, the WTI price increased to exceed Brent once again.

Note that this is an $8 premium that represents less than 15% of the WTI price. We are seeing a premium double that today which cannot be explained through refining shutdowns or anything like that. However, as Yves Smith recently pointed out to me, there is a huge glut of supply entering the States at Cushing (to where WTI is delivered) because of the limited storage capacity. But is this the technical factor creating the drop in WTI? The only other thing explaining this anomaly is that someone is losing their shirt in the commodities market right now.


Commodity Futures – Bloomberg

  1. Edward Harrison says

    This comes from FT Alphaville today:

    Yes, yes – oil is falling. Nymex WTI is sub $40 per barrel.

    But the case of Cushing is becoming increasingly important in regards to the pricing of the contract. Cushing, in Oklahoma, is the delivery point for Nymex WTI, which means anyone who wants to take physical delivery must have access to storage at Cushing. Of course, Cushing has a limited capacity. Also, oil can only flow in one direction out of storage there. As a result it can get bottlenecked relatively easily if demand for storage is elevated. This becomes increasingly likely when there is a contango in the market because the dynamic encourages oil storage.

    Of course, we’ve seen this before – the last time a super contango was apparent in the market was back in April 2007. As a result, WTI became increasingly disconnected from Brent as well as other US crude grades like Mars.

    It seems the problem may be re-emerging according to JBC Energy (our emphasis):

    The latest inventory data will also give more direction to WTI, which slumped recently compared to other crude benchmarks. In the physical market, the WTI 1st Mth/Brent 1st Mth spread widened to almost -$7.80 per barrel, down from strong premiums of more than $6 per barrel a month ago. This can be mainly attributed to increasing inventory levels in Cushing (PADD II), the delivery point for the Nymex Light Sweet Crude Oil Contract. Stocks were last seen at around 27 million barrels, up by almost 10 million barrels from early November. A similar situation was also observed in April and May 2007, when crude stocks in Cushing climbed to a record 28 million barrels, which resulted in the WTI 1st Mth/Brent 1st Mth spread widening to -$7.90 per barrel.

    See the rest here:

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More