US personal income data for September shows pullback
The data released this morning by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis on personal income somehow managed to show weakness in income and consumption as well as savings. I see this as proof that Americans are not saving and hence not deleveraging, but they are also so income constrained that their consumption should not be expected to increase markedly either. This points to a mild recovery.
The numbers from September show a significant decline in consumption from the cash-for-clunkers juiced August numbers.
Personal outlays — PCE, personal interest payments, and personal current transfer payments — decreased $48.8 billion in September, in contrast to an increase of $138.2 billion in August. PCE decreased $47.2 billion, in contrast to an increase of $139.8 billion.
If you take out August and cash-for-clunkers and look back at June and July, September’s consumption numbers are up a tick (annualized $10.53 trillion in personal outlays versus $10.44 trillion for July and $10.42 trillion for June).
So consumers are spending money. You can see this in the savings data as well.
Personal saving — DPI less personal outlays — was $355.6 billion in September, compared with $307.0 billion in August. Personal saving as a percentage of disposable personal income was 3.3 percent in September, compared with 2.8 percent in August.
3.3 percent is higher than 2.8 percent but it is a lot lower than 5.9 percent, which is where things were in May. I took this issue up at length in my post, “Americans are not increasing savings” earlier this month saying:
Savings rates averaged 9% through 1982. They were consistently above 7% through 1992. Since then, savings rates have collapsed. From Jan 1969 to November 1997 (comprising all monthly data since record-keeping began), the 10-year average savings rate was higher in every single month than the 5.9% savings rate achieved in May 2009.
So 2.8% is ridiculously low and inadequate to meet Americans’ needs in terms of reducing debt and Baby Boomers’ preparing for retirement. Absent asset-price appreciation as a source of savings, we are going to be in for some tough sledding in a few years. Clearly, record low interest rates are reducing the propensity to save.
On the other hand, incomes are still constrained. The BEA reports:
Personal income decreased $0.1 billion, or less than 0.1 percent, and disposable personal income (DPI) decreased $0.2 billion, or less than 0.1 percent, in September, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis…
Real disposable income decreased 0.1 percent in September, compared with a decrease of 0.2 percent in August. Real PCE decreased 0.6 percent, in contrast to an increase of 1.0 percent.
This puts personal income on par with Aug 2007 levels, as income is being reduced by high unemployment.
My analysis says the data are pointing to a mild recovery on the back of consumer spending which is being spurred by low interest rates. As a result, savings are now going back down to dangerously low levels. This mix is a direct result of policy decisions made in Washington, which are designed to recreate the pre-crisis status quo ante. Thus far, they have been successful.
Ed-
When you conclude that “they have been successful”, do you mean that in a good way or in the bad sense that we are set up for another implosion?
I definitely mean that in a bad way because it takes us back to the asset-based model which is unsustainable.
Thanks for clarifying, Ed.
Bernanke sucks. He missed the housing bubble, he kept rates to low when greenspan was there and he is pushing consumption like a drug pusher. This guy is a derelict bookwarm. I do not car how many degrees this clown has he has never had a real job or faced the wrath of the economy personally. His pampered academic career has not served him well.