Apple: Can it stop the Android menace?

I want to take a break from banking and macro stuff and talk a little bit about technology. I wrote an article about Android a few weeks back. That was a more personal account on why I was switching from a Windows Mobile phone to Android, the latest whiz-bang operating system running mobile phones. (Don’t ask me why I stuck with Windows Mobile for so long – even I don’t know any more). This article is looking at the Android phenomenon more from a strategic perspective.

You may have seen the Verizon commercials on TV. They’re everywhere: Droid has arrived. And this happens to be a big problem for Apple Computer.

(In case you haven’t seen the commercials, here is one embedded below)


As you probably know, I am a bit of a technophile.  I’m that guy you remember from high school who was taking AP Computer Science and programming in Pascal, the guy you remember who always had the latest gadget. And I’ve done my stint in technology companies too. But, at heart, I am a finance guy and when I look at technology, I do so from a finance guy’s point of view.  That’s why I see the emergence of Android phones as significant. The recent flurry of announcements about hardware manufacturers adopting the Android platform has me thinking about Apple Computer and the 1990s again – and that’s not good for Apple.

The Macintosh

From the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, I was a Macintosh user and an avid fan of Apple Computer and its products. I started using PCs only because incompatibility with my colleagues’ work product forced me to do so.  The Macintosh was miles ahead of the PC in user-friendliness and platform robustness. And Apple is a company that cares about customer service too.

But, forced to do so or not, I did switch to the PC, as did millions of others.  The reason: one company cannot compete against 100s. Apple refused to open its system and that limited production to Apple alone. Meanwhile, in PC world, you saw Compaq, Gateway 2000, HP, Dell, IBM, Toshiba, NEC, Packard Bell and a host of other vendors jumping onto the PC platform. Eventually, the PC was ubiquitous – and often incompatible with the Macintosh. How could Apple compete?  It couldn’t. Eventually, the Macintosh lost market share and became a niche product for die-hards, education and design.

Digital Music

But, Apple maintained its core competencies of user-friendliness, platform robustness and customer service. While PC makers were technology companies run by engineers, Apple was a consumer product company run by design and marketing. So, when Apple hit upon the digital music scene with iTunes and the iPod, it instantly became a success.

I am a big music fan. Because I tend to be an early adopter, I went all-in for digital music and CDs, buying my first CD player in 1988 – a top-rated Kyocera DA-610cx. When digital music hit the portable device market, I was there as well with my portable supposedly skip-free CD player plus car adapter. But, eventually I switched to Mini Disc and then on to Digital Audio Players. Remember the Diamond Rio 500?

The iPod

Then came the iPod. This was a ground-breaking product which was to digital music players what the Macintosh was to computers. It revolutionized the industry, bringing Apple Computer back to prominence as a technology company. The iPod became the dominant digital audio player (the hardware) – and with it, iTunes became the dominant digital music player (the software). It was almost like Intel and Microsoft rolled into one. Again, it was the product design and robustness of the iPod and the user-friendliness of Apple which made the difference.

Since then, Apple has successfully branched out into all manner of related spheres: video, podcasts, and most crucially digital music purchases and mobile telephones. They have also been very successful at integrating all of the platforms.

The iPhone – Android wars

But, everyone knows the standalone digital music player is passé. And iTunes, the digital music software application is free, a loss leader. The real money is going to come from digital music purchases and Apple’s mobile telephone, the iPhone. So, strategically speaking, this is why I see the flurry of announcements about Android phones as a problem for Apple.

Android is the Linux-based operating system developed by Google. it is now being implemented on a number of different platforms from internet tablets to low-end personal computers to mobile telephones

What I question is how Apple is going to compete in mobile telephones. Don’t let the hype around the Verizon Droid fool you. The phone, manufactured by Motorola, is a very good phone. But, it is only one of many that are now coming to market. There are also phones in the works from Sony Ericsson, Samsung, HTC, Dell, Garmin, LG, and a host of other manufacturers. Even Google is supposed to be coming forth with the much anticipated Google Phone – the phone designed to prevent the splintering of Android which doomed Unix as a consumer-based operating system.

To my eyes, this is looking like a repeat of the Macintosh-PC Wars of the 1990s which Apple lost. On the one side, you have Apple, competing at the high end and very concerned about platform integrity and control, and preventing other manufacturers from building its hardware. On the other side, you have another operating system designed for the lower end and installed on a host of manufacturer systems – which may or may not cause serious platform integrity problems down the line.  Who wins that battle?

In the 1990s it was Intel and Microsoft. And they went on to reap massive rewards as Apple foundered.  Today, Apple risks a repeat of this if it does not come out with a credible solution to deal with its burgeoning Android problem.

  1. Name says

    I wasn’t around in the ’80s to see how Macintosh declined, but I suppose Apple didn’t have the same level of market share as it does now in the smartphone segment with the iPhone. Suffice saying, all the people I know that are thinking about getting a better phone are first thinking about the iPhone (or the JesusPhone as The Reg named it). I think eventually the Android will be their biggest competitor in the consumer area (the corporate one is way too dominated by RIM), but this time Apple has a well-consolidated first mover advantage with the Apple Store nearing 90 000 applications. Probably that would be enough for most iPhone users to not make the switch. And if the iPhone moves to Verizon and other carriers it might get an extra push too…
    Which surely doesn’t exclude the possibility that Apple shares aren’t overvalued!

  2. Joel says

    Lost in all of this, except in your opening and closing paragraphs is Microsoft. They have completely missed this transition from home computers to pocket computers and it will cost them big time. I had heard how Google was set to become the new Microsoft, but failed to truly see how until Android OS. Microsoft seems set to become a history lesson.

    1. Edward Harrison says

      I also didn’t touch on RIMM, Nokia, the handset makers, developers or the telcos! I tried to keep a narrow focus on the Apple-Google thing but, like you, I suspect Google is gunning for Microsoft as much if not more than Apple. I see Android as a Trojan Horse into the desktop space.

      I ran this at Naked Capitalism as well and there are a lot of good comments.

  3. Jeff 'SKI' Kinsey says

    Edward, nice post. I too have “been there; done that; got the t-shirts.”

    Now that we have the “back story” give me some details on which is better. I have not switched to the iPhone because of AT&T. I am not alone. I live off my iTouch for a ton of computing, and expect to get an iPad (my wife loves it too) when that next big contract comes through… so, I need to tether the iTouch to something now, the iPad later. I am considering Sprint and their Droid (June 4th, methinks). But as a former Alltel client (now on Verizon), I may go that way. But now comes Walmart selling the iPhone 3Gs for $97! But no 3G coverage anytime soon in my locale… so what is a techie to do?

    1. Edward Harrison says

      consultski, I have a Nexus One on the T-Mobile network so I know about spotty coverage! The thing is I wouldn’t go with an AT&T-based iPhone because of switching costs and because the coverage is no better, worse in SF and NY. THAT’s the problem for Apple.

      I mean, as a techie, I have a lot of other reasons I don’t like the iPhone – and that’s the reason I like the Nexus One. But for the mainstream, it is really a great phone.

      The problem is that there are always switching costs. And when the phone has good features, is attractively priced and the network coverage is good, you can overcome those costs. the iPhone only has 2 of 3. The Droid and Droid Incredible have 3 of 3.

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More