How to downsize the US financial sector

I was heartened to hear that Alan Greenspan has repudiated the Too Big to Fail doctrine (as practiced in the Bush and Obama Administrations) in such unequivocal terms. He almost sounded like a Teddy Roosevelt trust buster.

Nevertheless, President Obama clearly believes the line fed to him by Wall Street. He is no Teddy Roosevelt. The question you should be asking is, will the tentative reforms proposed by the Obama Administration have any kind of positive effect?  The answer is probably in a very temporary fashion, but that is more a function of the impairment of the capital markets themselves.  However, if you don’t deal with a cancer fully, it comes back and spreads – even if you conduct surgery to take out some of the tumour.

Reform of the current US financial sector is neither possible nor would it ever be sufficient. It’s a bit like Lincoln saying, "Well, this slavery thing has a few problems, but we can ‘reform’ it and make it better.”  As any student of horror films knows, you cannot reform zombies. Zombie banks must be killed. In other words, the financial system must be downsized.

Downsizing can begin with the following set of actions:

  • All bank assets and liabilities must be brought onto balance sheets, and made subject to reserve and capital requirements and—more importantly—to normal oversight by appropriate regulatory agencies. Any assets and liabilities that are left off balance sheet will be declared null and void, unenforceable by US courts.
  • All CDSs must be bought and sold on regulated exchanges; otherwise they will be declared unenforceable by US courts.
  • Unless specifically approved by Congress, securitization of financial products such as life insurance policies will be prohibited and thus unenforceable by US courts.
  • The FDIC will be directed to examine the books of the largest 25 insured banks to uncover all CDS contracts held. These will then be netted among these 25 banks, canceling CDS contracts held on one another. CDS contracts with foreign banks will be unwound. The FDIC will also examine derivative positions with a view to determine whether unwinding these would be in the public interest.
  • In its examination, the FDIC will determine which of these banks is insolvent based on current market values—after netting positions. Those that are insolvent will be resolved. Resolution will be accomplished with a goal of i) minimizing cost to FDIC and ii) minimizing impacts on the rest of the banking system. It will be necessary to cover some uninsured losses to other financial institutions as well as to equity holders (such as pension funds) arising due to the resolution.

These actions should substantially reduce the size of the financial sector, and would eliminate some of the riskiest assets, including assets that serve no useful public purpose. The financial system would emerge with healthier institutions and with much less market concentration.

Failing that, we should at least have the government get into the insurance business as credit insurer of last resort. Private firms can’t do it, as they do not have the financial resources to meet the potential claims (see AIG).  And private firms have a tendency to mis-price credit risk (again, see AIG), which creates further incentives to bad behaviour. 

As "Credit Insurer of Last Resort" (see Professor Perry Mehrling’s paper inventing this term – pdf), the government can charge proper premiums for it, which will have the additional impact of mitigating the worst behaviour of Wall Street. The government can put a floor on the value of the best collateral in the system. As Mehrling says (in a variation of the Bagehot rule – i.e. "lend freely but at a high rate during a crisis"): “Insure freely but at a high premium.”


Shadow Banking: What It Is, How it Broke, and How to Fix It – Atlantic Magazine

  1. Redeye says

    Agree with everything but the life insurance securitizations. US Supreme Court in 1911 declared policies assets, no different than stocks or bonds. So keep your hands off my property, if I was dumb enough to buy it.

    What I mean by that is the life settlement market is made up of permanent life, not term. Permanent was created for high-net worth individuals with complicated estate planning issues. Since then, it’s been increasingly marketed as an “investment,” and a pretty craptacular one at that, unless you think retirees holding negative-cash flow instruments is a good idea.

    Allowing seniors to sell their policies for more than the cash value redemption is a win-win for everyone involved, except of course for the insurance industry, who is counting on the policyholder to take the abysmally low cash value, as more than 80% have to date.

    Face it, this is a $12 billion a year market that would only double in size should policies be bundled by Wall Street. That’s still less than a drop in the bucket and carries zero systemic risk to anyone. There are plenty of good reasons to criticize financial innovation, but this isn’t one of them.

  2. Tim says

    What do we do about CDS contracts governed and enforced by BRITISH law or any other countries law. Allow all of the foreign assets of US financial institutions to be seized? Could this cause a run on US treasuries. I would also note Glass Stegall back in the day never applied to the foreign branches of US banks in places like London.

  3. LavrentiBeria says

    What a steaming pile of crap this detestable little slug, Greenspan, is. After having practically insured the collapse we’ve all just experienced, we now have penitant on our hands? I mean, really! Exactly what value has there been to the professional life this eel has led over the last several decades anyway, the insertion of impression-creating cliche’s like “accomodative” into the lexicon? Sure looks that way, doesn’t it? Why even give this filth a platform? Better that he be held, interrogated and given a public trial.

  4. Anonymous says

    petition @whitehouse to Downsize the U.S. financial sector

  5. Anonymous says

    Greenspan is a derelict who did massive harm to our economy over last 2 decades. lock him up along with his remaining buddies at the Fed.

Comments are closed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More