Libertarian paradise in Somalia
This is pretty funny. Hat tip Linda.
By the way, Linda, this is not my Libertarian ideal! It’s called anarchy.
Recover your password.
A password will be e-mailed to you.
This is pretty funny. Hat tip Linda.
By the way, Linda, this is not my Libertarian ideal! It’s called anarchy.
Edward Harrison is a senior Editor at Bloomberg. He is also the founder of Credit Writedowns newsletter, a former career diplomat, investment banker and technology executive with over twenty five years of business experience. He speaks six languages and reads another five, skills he uses to provide a more global perspective. Edward holds an MBA in Finance from Columbia University and a BA in Economics from Dartmouth College.
Prev Post
Comments are closed.
Aren’t you missing something Edward? The choice is not between living in the US with its big but stable government and living in Somalia, where the corrupt military government collapsed. What you have to ask is if the Somali people were better off today or before their corrupt government fell. If you look at the data there is no question that the fall of the government has increased the standard of living, overall health, education and security. Unlike before, when free expression was forbidden and punishable by death, there are private newspapers and magazines. Infant mortality has declined by 24%. Access to sanitation and health care has improved. Somalia has improved more than its neighbours, who still have functioning governments.
I have to say that I am disappointed because I expected something more than a clever appeal to statist sentiments.
This is a parody, if you hadn’t noticed. Get a sense of humour. Somalia is an example of anarchy, not freedom, my friend.
I know that it is supposed to be a parody. But it is the type that is used by statists to argue for more government.
And you are still missing the point. The data shows that Somalis are better off now, under the ‘anarchy’ that you frown upon, than they were under the government that was overthrown. That makes the current condition preferable to the previous one. I think that you need to really examine your belief system. For a guy who claims some libertarian leanings at time you seem to cheerlead statism much more often than not.